by
Scott D. Parker
One of my favorite sub-genres of music is when legacy artists create new music in the 21st Century. I’m not talking about bands like Bruce Springsteen, Bon Jovi, or Def Leppard who never stopped putting out new music. I’m referring to bands like The Beach Boys (That's Why God Made the Radio), Eagles (Long Road Out of Eden), or David Bowie (Blackstar) who go into the studio basically knowing that the soon-to-be-recorded album will be the swan song. The songs can sometimes acknowledge the passing of time, the artists’ ages, and their long careers.
Yesterday, one of my favorite bands joined the ranks of legacy artists creating new music that fits into this mold. Chicago released “If This Is Goodbye,” from their forthcoming album (not sure if they’ll use XXXVIII or a more streamlined 38). From the title alone, you get the vibe of the song. It is a wistful song with a typical surface meaning of two lovers looking back over their lives but we all know what it’s really saying: This band, through triumphs and tragedies and reinventions, has persevered but the end is nigh. Here’s the link.
It is a sobering thought to have yet another band that have been there my entire life reach the end of the road. KISS, my other favorite band, is literally on their End of the Road Tour. But those founding members of Chicago have been working musicians for nearly 60 years, 55 as Chicago. That’s a good, long run, and they deserve to do whatever they way to do, be it touring or just kicking up their heels and marveling at their accomplishments.
Authors, however, are different. At least I think they are.
I don’t presume to know if every single series character ages. I can’t say if Agatha Christie wrote her last Hercule Poirot novel knowing it would be the end or not.
I’ve only recently started reading the novels and blog posts of Max Allan Collins but in his posts, he talks about slowing down. Now, his output is still pretty prolific, but he acknowledges that some of the aspects of writing—namely the research he needs for his historical mysteries—is more challenging that it used to be. Again, I’m not as well versed with his bibliography as others are, but I wonder if he’s going to start writing that final Heller novel knowing it’s the last one.
Didn’t Michael Connelly age Harry Bosch along the way? Ian Fleming died while writing his final James Bond novel so I suspect that he didn’t approach The Man With the Golden Gun in that way. I don’t know about Sue Grafton’s Kinsey Millhone either.
What about authors who, say, haven’t written a book in twenty years and suddenly come out with a new one? I’m not talking about a found manuscript, a la Erle Stanley Gardner’s 2016 novel The Knife Slipped (written in 1939), that is then republished.
Maybe I’m zeroing in on series characters that actually age along with their creators. How many of them got their last book with an eye to the author knowing it was the last book?
Showing posts with label continuing series. Show all posts
Showing posts with label continuing series. Show all posts
Saturday, May 21, 2022
Legacy Authors and That Last Book
Sunday, September 23, 2012
Looking for the familiar
By: Joelle Charbonneau
My husband is a huge fan of the Phantom of the Opera. Me…eh…I like it just fine, but if you got
into a musical theater debate with me, I’d probably come up with all sorts of
reasons why I think the show needs a bit more tweaking. Which is probably a bit audacious of me, but
hey, I’m allowed my opinion, right?
Anyway, because my husband is a fan, he has been following
the launch and reworking of the sequel to Phantom, Love Never Dies, with great
interest. While Phantom of the Opera was
a huge hit, the sequel hasn’t set the world on fire. In fact, a lot of die hard Phantom fans (my
husband not included) have had huge complaints about the new show. Because of that, Sir Andrew Lloyd Webber and team
have reworked the music and tinkered with the story. But no matter the changes, the musical still
has yet to connect with the existing fan base.
Why?
The writer in me has a theory. It is because the characters have
changed. The story opens almost a decade
after the original ended. Of course the
characters have changed. They gotten
married, had children, led lives. It only stands to reason that things will be
different. But, to me, the problem isn’t
that the characters’ lives have changed—that which makes them what they are has
changed. The heroine is no longer
heroic. The musical opens with her
having committed betrayals that at the core change who she is and how the
audience connects with her. The Phantom—the
villain or anti-hero of the first musical—is now the hero. Characters we liked have become warped and
filled with jealousy and hate. While the
characters are still familiar by name, they are not familiar by nature which automatically
disconnects the audience and disrupts the story before it ever has a chance to
begin.
Crime fiction is filled with continuing characters and long
running mystery and thriller series.
Time passes in between the last page of one book and the first page of
the next. Weeks, months and years go by
between one case and another. Readers
are willing to accept that their favorite characters’ lives have
continued. But despite those changes when
they open the next book, the reader expect to “know” them. They expect that the choices that the
characters have made between one book and the next will reflect the character’s
core values and beliefs that are demonstrated on the page. Those core values can change, but not out of
the sight of the reader. A reader wants
to see those changes. To live them
alongside the character. To feel the
emotional tug-of-war and experience the path the character takes to come out
the other side. To change the core of a
character out of sight of the reader is akin to pulling a bait and switch. Which isn’t fun for anyone.
I’ve stopped reading a number of series because the
characters felt distant and unfamiliar at the start of the next book. Have you ever had that problem? Have you ever felt cheated because a
character had a major experience that you didn’t get to be a part of or changed
them in a way that made the character unappealing? And if you’re a writer, how do you deal with
the time gaps that inevitably occur in between books? Do you worry about what hasn’t been shown on
the page? And hey – who knows—maybe the
folks in charge of Love Never Dies will read your comments and figure out how
to make it the next blockbuster musical.
My husband would be grateful if they did!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)