By Steve Weddle
First, let me thank everyone who came out to the NYC reading at The Mysterious Bookshop
We had a great time. I read "Purple Hulls" from Country Hardball
and then we did an audience-participation segment, acting out various scenes from the novel. Folks were pretty cool about it, though one of the volunteers begged out after being told what the story was about.
Totally fine. No one is judging you, Peter J.
If you weren't able to come, you can still snag a signed copy from The Mysterious Bookshop
and from Fountain Bookstore
in Richmond, where we did the launch on November 20.
Also, I hid a copy in FAO Scwartz (near Iron Man) and one in a pizza place (I forget which one) in Midtown. Both are signed.
So I'd like to say thanks again to everyone who came out and those who wanted to, but couldn't -- especially if you bought the book. *winks charminglyish*
Also, thank you for reading along with us at DSD.
And thanks to Eva Dolan
for coming along with us. Sad to see her leave.
Next week, Holly West
joins the team. And for that, we are thankful.
And speaking of thanks, we were chatting this week on Twitter and Facebook about whether it was a good idea for authors to thank book reviewers, specifically for a good review of the author's book.
CheffoJeffo, a book blogger, had some thoughts
following the discussion. Also, @popqueenie had some smart things to say
from the reviewer side of things
I'm sure others have, too.
Basically what we're talking about is this:
1) Jenny wrote a book.
2) Mike wrote a nice review of the book.
Does Jenny email Mike to thank him? If so, what does that email look like?
"Mike, thanks for the nice review of my book. I am glad that you enjoyed it. Cheers, Jenny."
Is that cool? It seems most everyone agrees that thanking a reviewer is a good idea. Hell, I figure most authors are like me in that they're pleased as hell that a reviewer went to the trouble to read and review. I've written many reviews, especially here on DSD. Authors don't always say "thanks," though I figure they appreciate it. Of course, I don't review a book to make the author happy. I review a book because I loved the book and want other people to know about this piece of awesome that they might enjoy. Still, it is nice to be thanked. But it can be kinda weird, too.
(By the way, I do realize I should put this in a "10 Things" post with GIFs and snark. I ain't gonna. But I realize that I should for teh internet.)
Laura K. Curtis, whose Twisted
just hit shelves, said she'd gotten the impression that some reviewers felt as if they were being stalked, as if they couldn't be as free with reviews if they knew the author was watching them.
If you're reviewing a book and worried what the author will think, does that impact your review?
Also, if you're friends with the author -- or enemies -- does that impact? Or at least have the appearance of a conflict. ahem
So, should the author and the reviewer remain at a distance, one never acknowledging the work of the other?
How weird would that be? Mike reads Jenny's 483-page book, then writes a brilliant 2,376-word post about that book's genius, but Jenny can't be bothered to say "thanks" for what Mike wrote even though Mike spent all that time and effort praising what Jenny had written? Damn you, Jenny. You suck.
But, then there's what Sean Chercover
said about a "thank you" being misconstrued
as an attempt to influence the reviewer.
's own Rebecca Schinsky
pointed out, that might be a problem with the reviewer.
We started a nice conversation on Facebook about this. Here
Also, what constitutes an appropriate "thanks"?
Does saying "Thanks" and RTing the review on Twitter carry as much weight as a personal email to the reviewer? Or should you mention the review on your own blog and send people to the reviewer's blog? Or should you comment on that reviewer's blog with a simple "thank you," since comments are currency? I mean, there's nothing worse (except war and famine and stuff) than spending 4,000 words reviewing a book and an author, only to have zero comments on your post five days later. :(
Is a personal email invasive? Is a public comment just another #humblebrag?
"Thanks a bunch to @Ed69 for this five-star review of my Edgar-nominated novel STANDARD MYSTERY, now available at amzn.co/37362."
And what about just using the review without ever acknowledging the reviewer at all? I don't know of any decent writer who would argue the merits of that.
So, I ask you, what's the right response?
Let's assume we want to thank the reviewer.
Publicly? RT or FB Share with a "thank you" attached?
Private email or message?
On the reviewer's blog?
On your blog?