by Scott Adlerberg
(This comes from an essay I wrote on Chester Himes' Harlem Detective novel series that will appear next year in a collection of pieces on radical pulp fiction edited by Andrew Nette).
It's his last book, it's
unfinished, and it's a difficult book to enjoy, but now is the time Chester
Himes' Plan B seems more relevant
than ever. It's the novel in which Himes gives vent to his apparent
belief, after years writing in controlled anger, that racial justice through peaceful means is a pipe dream and that only
violent revolution by blacks against whites will change the established order. Though it does feature his two series detectives, Gravedigger Jones and
Coffin Ed Johnson, Plan B is his novel about this revolution and
its possible consequences, with Jones and Johnson playing, in essence, a
supporting role.
Easily
the most violent of Himes' books, Plan B has a loose plot that
follows the doings of Tomsson Black, a black man of humble origins. Through a
series of unlikely events, Green becomes a wealthy revolutionary masquerading
as a black businessman. Rich white people befriend and financially
support him during his rise to respectability, and he uses their money to buy
huge stocks of weapons that he funnels to blacks for his uprising.
The novel alternates between historical chapters tracing Tomsson’s background
and contemporary chapters (the 1970's) in Harlem where the revolution breaks
out. Grave Digger and Coffin Ed come into it when they respond to what
seems like an ordinary killing in Harlem among junkies. At the apartment
where a heroin addict killed a woman friend of his, they find a high-powered
rifle that was mysteriously sent to the man along with an incendiary
note. The note tells the weapon’s recipient to learn how to use the gun,
wait for instructions, and not tell the police. It promises that “FREEDOM
IS NEAR!!!!”
Plan B is part thriller,
part satire, part political screed. As blacks perpetuate random and
horrific violence against whites and whites retaliate against
blacks, Himes fills his narrative with acid observations:
It
was then, as both escape and therapy that he [Tomsson Black] had begun moving
in the circles of Northern white liberals who needed the presence of a black
face to prove their liberalism.
And
there were some whites who went about crying publicly…touching blacks on the
street as if to express their suffering through contact, and sobbingly
confessing their sorrow and begging the blacks’ forgiveness. There were a
few extremists who even bent over and offered their asses for blacks to kick,
but blacks weren’t sure whether they were meant to kick them or kiss them, so
in their traditional manner, they cautiously avoided making any decision at
all.
The
citizens of other nations in the world found it difficult to reconcile this
excessive display of guilt by America’s white community with its traditional
treatment of blacks. What the citizens of the world didn’t understand was
that American whites are a traditionally masochistic people, and their sense of
guilt toward their blacks is an integral part of the national character.
The novel has an over the top quality and an apocalyptic tone.
Himes pours on the violence and depicts the carnage with gusto. Blacks
massacre white men, women, children, and old people. Whites talk
about bringing back slavery and castrating black males. They enlist
big game hunters to go on “The Black Hunt”. Blood flows in the
streets. Blacks do not get intimidated and continue killing
whites. It’s as if Himes is indulging in a fantasy long held and
until now somewhat suppressed: the ultimate revenge of American blacks against
American whites for the legacy of racism and injustice. No non-violent
method of protest has gotten black people to the point they need to be – equal
with whites – so the only option left is violence. At the very least,
even with whites striking back, using a tank to level a Harlem house, lynching
a man at a concert in Central Park, violence offers black people consolation;
they have the satisfaction of seeing white people in constant fear. The
disorder spread through the secret machinations of Tomsson Black provides for a
catharsis no peaceful means of protest can equal.
Or does it? Does this alleged catharsis lead anywhere? For
all Himes' expressed belief in the necessity of armed insurrection, Plan
B betrays an ambivalence in him. For starters, the insurrection
he lays out, whatever Tomsson Black’s original plans for it, deteriorates fast
into haphazard violence. People given weapons to use, with virtually
no one to guide them, run amuck. Blacks are no different than whites
in this aspect. Near the end of the novel, Tomsson confesses that he
should have anticipated this. The uprising he envisioned has spun
out of his control. Blacks committing their murderous acts against
whites has resulted in the United States becoming a field of
pandemonium. How this will end even Tomsson Black can’t predict, but
he feels that he must keep distributing guns and “let maniacal, unorganized,
and uncontrolled blacks massacre enough whites to make a dent in the white man’s
hypocrisy…”
It's possible that this book doesn't get the attention of Himes
other novels because he never finished it. It's conceivable also
that Himes stopped working on it because he’d written himself into a
corner. How do you end such a book? Reconciliation after
all the violence would seem implausible, so what do you do instead? Have the
whites exterminate the blacks? The blacks wipe out the
whites? Does Himes really think mayhem like this will lead to racial
equality, or is he saying that uncoordinated violence doesn’t work and will
never help blacks attain their goals? Maybe Himes is suggesting that
whatever blacks do, they have to get their numbers in order before they mount
any serious offensives against the white power machine. It’s not
violence itself that Himes seems to frown on, but violence that squanders
opportunity and becomes misdirected. However it's read, Plan B comes with
all the bite but less of the fun of the first eight Coffin Ed and
Gravedigger Jones books, but it’s one that even in its extremity should be better known. It was his last Harlem detective novel and his last novel overall,
and for anyone at all interested in Himes or in crime fiction with a strong social bent, it's a must.
Especially right now.
1 comment:
Thanks for the post here. I've not read Plan B, though I count myself a fan of Himes' novels generally. Whenever I've taught Cotton Comes to Harlem (one of my favorite books to teach, in fact), we've focused on the blend of satire and violence and anger and humor and amidst all of it the pointed social critiques. This one does indeed sound like all that amped up even further. I'll look forward to reading it sometimes, and again I appreciate the reflections here.
Post a Comment