Guest Post by Dana King
First, thanks to Scott
Adlerberg for allowing me to use his spot this week. I’ve been a fan of Do Some Damage since it premiered and
Scott has made Tuesdays particularly worth reading. This is a treat for me.
Scott asked me to write about
the private eye genre. Specifically, “How do you approach it with the
confidence you can bring something fresh to it? How do you avoid ‘the anxiety
of influence;’ you know, working in a field so well walked on?”
I liked PI stories from the
first time I read Encyclopedia Brown or Sherlock Holmes, which naturally drew
me to writing them. There was an established canon with its own Pantheon of
heroes: Hammett, Chandler, Spillane, Macdonald, Parker, Lehane, and plenty of
others. I had no delusions of doing anything they hadn’t done. All I ever
wanted to do was to write what I was capable of as well as I could write it.
I never thought of what I
wrote in comparison to anyone else until I received some reviews with
flattering comparisons, along with a Shamus nomination a few years ago. (I’m
not quite done riding that bad boy into the ground yet.) All of that was—and
is—flattering, but I still don’t really think of myself in comparison to anyone
else, nor do I try to measure up to anyone else, mainly because I know I can’t.
Anyone established enough to be a yardstick is a unique collection of superior
talents. I couldn’t be any of them if I tried, so why worry about it?
The “anxiety of influence” is
a good term; I’m almost sure to steal it. I don’t really have any, I think
because I know I can’t be as good as those guys. Frankly, I hope they do influence me. It’s like playing a
sport or being a musician. You only get better by playing with people better
than you. I read Hammet and Chandler and the others because I want them to influence me, mainly by
keeping the bar I strive for higher than I’ll ever attain. That will keep me
reaching and should allow me to get better than I would have without their
influence.
Along those lines, I’m not
one of those writers who doesn’t read in his chosen field when working on a
book, for fear someone else’s style will rub off on me. I look for a good rub
every time I open one of their books. Not so I can steal anything, but reading
the masters while working myself is a good way to remind myself of what I want
to accomplish in more or less real time. There are elements of all the greats
I’d like to see in my writing—I think most writers have some of that—and
keeping them fresh in my mind is a good way to catch myself before I fall into
bad habits.
Tests have shown I’m about as
left-brained as I am right-brained, so I’m not likely to be someone about whom readers
and critics rave about for breaking revolutionary new ground. Considering how
much great PI writing already exists, doing something completely different
isn’t even necessarily a good thing; there may be a reason no one else has done
it. What I hope to do is to learn from those who came before me and adapt what
I can from their work to suit my skill set. For example:
- Hammett for concise language and no melodrama.
- Chandler for the clever simile when opportunity presents. (Not too
many, as that’s become a cliché itself.) Also not to be afraid to take a
moment to elevate the language a little if the situation calls for
it.
- Parker, for his willingness to let the story catch its breath
while the hero and best friend banter.
- George V. Higgins, not a PI writer, but for allowing dialog to
carry as much of the story as possible.
- Ed McBain, another non-PI guy, for not being afraid to poke a hole
in the fourth wall and speak directly to the reader once in a while.
I don’t think I use enough of
any of their characteristics to worry about ripping them off or writing
derivatively. They are always there, though, teaching a master class every time
I open one of their books, showing me the direction in which I want to travel,
even though I’ll have to take my own route to get there. They climbed Everest,
and I’m not going to pretend I can reach such heights. I look for their
guidance to keep me from wandering the foothills forever.
BIO
Dana King’s first Nick Forte
novel earned a Shamus nomination for best independently produced PI novel in
2013. His newest book, A Dangerous Lesson,
is the fourth Nick Forte novel. Dana recently signed with Down & Out Books
to publish his Penns River novels, a series about an economically depressed
town in Western Pennsylvania.
Scott Note:
A Dangerous Lesson, Dana's newest Nick Forte PI novel, just came out, and you can get it here at Amazon.
1 comment:
I'm ten pages from home with A Dangerous Lesson and it's another gem from this guy ... and who's got it better'n him right now? Penguins about to win the cup and a terrific new novel being released.
Dana is one of the most clever writers around these days, FACT. I started jotting down my favorite lines early on for a review and had to stop or I'd be jotting most of the book. Review this weekend on TK, but it's a terrific read, start to finish ... and the recurring characters from his other Forte novels makes it all the more inviting.
Post a Comment